Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Opteron 3280 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron G1610T
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G1610T
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,710 |
VS
Released March, 2012
AMD Opteron 3280
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 3280
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | More l3 cache 8 MB |
| | More cores 8 | | Much better performance per watt 10.33 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,710 | vs | 900 | 90% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date 10 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 2 MB | 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.33 pt/W | vs | 3.69 pt/W | More than 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more threads | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,330 | vs | 2,322 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 2.44 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610T vs Opteron 3280
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G1610T | vs | Opteron 3280 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.69 pt/W | 10.33 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
details | Celeron G1610T | vs | Opteron 3280 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 23 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.44 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.44 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
 Intel Celeron G1610T  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 3280 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $64 | $42 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020T vs Celeron G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $189 | $42 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2 vs Celeron G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | ||
| AMD Turion II Neo N54L vs Intel Celeron G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | $42 | |
| Intel Core i3 2120 vs Celeron G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $311 | $42 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1260L vs Celeron G1610T | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $42 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs G1610T | ||
 | VS |  |
| $128 | ||
| AMD FX 8350 vs Opteron 3280 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
