Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 55.25W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,710 vs 812 More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Better performance per watt 3.69 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W Around 3.5x better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 16.38 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 59.57 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2216 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2216 HE

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz vs 2.44 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610T vs Opteron 2216 HE

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron G1610T
119,750 MB/s
Opteron 2216 HE
55,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610T  vs
Opteron 2216 HE 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 68W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 16.38 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 59.57 $/year
Performance per watt 3.69 pt/W 1.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 55.25W

details

Celeron G1610T  vs
Opteron 2216 HE 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 23 12

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2216 HE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus