Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 350 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 0.09 GHz More than 25.5x higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz vs 0.09 GHz More than 27x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 0.09 GHz More than 25.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD K5 PR90

Reasons to consider the
AMD K5 PR90

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K5 PR90 vs the Intel Celeron G1610T.

Features Key features of the Celeron G1610T  vs K5 PR90 

clock speed

Celeron G1610T
2.3 GHz
K5 PR90
0.09 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron G1610T
2.44 GHz
K5 PR90
0.09 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron G1610T
2.3 GHz
K5 PR90
0.09 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610T  vs
K5 PR90 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 0.09 GHz

features

Has a NX bit Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A

details

Celeron G1610T  vs
K5 PR90 
Manufacture process 22 nm 350 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 0.09 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 0.09 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 0.09 GHz
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction
AMD K5 PR90
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus