Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.68 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 445

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 445

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 445 vs the G1610.

Features Key features of the Celeron G1610  vs 445 

clock speed

Celeron G1610
2.6 GHz
Celeron 445
1.86 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron G1610
2.69 GHz
Celeron 445
1.87 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron G1610
2.68 GHz
Celeron 445
1.87 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1610  vs
445 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 65W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 44.69W 52.81W

details

Celeron G1610  vs
445 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.69 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.68 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron G1610
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 445
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus