Intel Celeron G1610 vs AMD Opteron 848 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron G1610
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G1610
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 44.69W | | Newer Jan, 2013 |
VS
Released November, 2003
AMD Opteron 848
- 2.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 848
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 72.31W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Nov, 2003 | Release date over 9 years later | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,970 | vs | 972 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,499 | vs | 958 | Around 3.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | vs | 1.15 pt/W | More than 70% better performance per watt | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.68 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610 vs Opteron 848
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G1610 | vs | Opteron 848 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| 940 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Celeron G1610 | vs | Opteron 848 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
| Clock multiplier | 26 | 11 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.68 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | 1.15 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 72.31W | |
 Intel Celeron G1610  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 848 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $42 | $75 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $125 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $50 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $179 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $76 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G2030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $42 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs G550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $70 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G620 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
