0 Comments
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs AMD A4 5300 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron G1610
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron G1610
![]() | Much more l3 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD A4 5300
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD A4 5300
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.49 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l3 cache per core | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.49 GHz | vs | 2.69 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.68 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1610 vs A4 5300
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron G1610
1,994
A4 5300
2,042
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron G1610
886
A4 5300
1,355
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron G1610
2,187
A4 5300
2,264
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G1610
3,499
A4 5300
2,755
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G1610
1,970
A4 5300
1,802
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron G1610
136,000 MB/s
A4 5300
2,030,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron G1610
2,498
A4 5300
1,999
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron G1610
1,397
A4 5300
1,252
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron G1610 | vs | A4 5300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.96 pt/W | 7.32 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W |
details | Celeron G1610 | vs | A4 5300 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 6 | 5 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.69 GHz | 4.49 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.68 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | 4.49 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ HD 7480D | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 723 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 |
Intel Celeron G1610 ![]() | AMD A4 5300 ![]() |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Celeron G1610, starting from $83
- 1 desktop with the AMD A4 5300, starting from $196
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $50 | |
5300 vs 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $179 | |
5300 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $125 | |
G1610 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $75 | |
G1610 vs G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $179 | |
G1610 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $76 | |
G1610 vs G2030 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 4 comments.
cubases (02:43 PM, February 9, 2015)
Сергей (12:04 AM, March 13, 2014)
guestington (11:56 PM, March 12, 2014)
Сергей (10:51 PM, March 12, 2014)