Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 4100

AMD FX 4100

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron G1101

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1101

Report a correction
Much lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year vs 34.18 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year vs 114.41 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 4100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4100

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per dollar 8.44 pt/$ vs 1.01 pt/$ More than 8.2x better performance per dollar
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 6.46 pt/W vs 0.97 pt/W Around 6.8x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.66 GHz vs 3.32 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 4,051 vs 1,727 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.99 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron G1101 vs FX 4100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 4100
4,051

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron G1101  vs
FX 4100 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1156
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 95W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 34.18 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 114.41 $/year
Performance per watt 0.97 pt/W 6.46 pt/W
Typical power consumption 59.31W N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1066
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Celeron G1101  vs
FX 4100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 382,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.32 GHz 4.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 4.99 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz 4.66 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture DMI HyperTransport 3.1
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 5,200 MT/s
Intel Celeron G1101
Report a correction
AMD FX 4100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus