Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E3400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3400

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,275 vs 1,895 More than 20% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz vs 3.36 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 73.3 °C Almost the same
Newer Jan, 2010 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron E1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E1500 vs the E3400.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron E3400 vs E1500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron E3400
110,600 MB/s
Celeron E1500
93,750 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E3400  vs
E1500 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.64 pt/W 1.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 52.81W

details

Celeron E3400  vs
E1500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 13 11
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 0.85 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 73.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.85 GHz 3.36 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz 3.36 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Celeron E3400
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E1500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus