Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E3300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 67.7 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz vs 3.65 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.61 GHz vs 4.32 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron D 336

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 336

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Celeron E3300  vs D 336 

clock speed

Celeron E3300
2.5 GHz
Celeron D 336
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron E3300
3.93 GHz
Celeron D 336
3.65 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron E3300
4.61 GHz
Celeron D 336
4.32 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E3300  vs
D 336 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 84W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 68.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron E3300  vs
D 336 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 21
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 67.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.93 GHz 3.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.61 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz 3.65 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron E3300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 336
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus