Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E3300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron E3300 vs the AMD A6 3450.

Front view of AMD A6 3450

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Celeron E3300  vs A6 3450 

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E3300  vs
A6 3450 
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 775
FM1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron E3300  vs
A6 3450 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 65W 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 52.81W
Intel Celeron E3300
Report a correction
AMD A6 3450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus