Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E3200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.82 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron E1600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1600

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E1600 vs the E3200.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron E3200 vs E1600

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron E3200
109,650 MB/s
Celeron E1600
77,200 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E3200  vs
E1600 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Celeron E3200  vs
E1600 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.82 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.82 GHz 3.4 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.8 pt/W 1.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 52.81W
Intel Celeron E3200
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E1600
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus