Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C vs 67.7 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2006 vs Jun, 2005 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Celeron D 336

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 336

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.65 GHz vs 3.36 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron E1500  vs D 336 

clock speed

Celeron E1500
2.2 GHz
Celeron D 336
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron E1500
0.5 MB
Celeron D 336
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron E1500
3.36 GHz
Celeron D 336
3.65 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron E1500
2.2 GHz
Celeron D 336
4.32 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E1500  vs
D 336 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 84W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 68.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron E1500  vs
D 336 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 125,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 21
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 67.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.36 GHz 3.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.36 GHz 3.65 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron E1500
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 336
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus