CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E1400 vs 1200 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron E1400 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron E1400  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E1400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1400

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.44 GHz vs 1.41 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 693 vs 368 Around 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 52.81W 3.6x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 73.3 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 4 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 2.33 pt/W vs 1.2 pt/W Around 95% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron E1400 vs E1 1200

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

E1 1200
1,310

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron E1400  vs
E1 1200 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 18W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 1.2 pt/W 2.33 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 14.63W

details

Celeron E1400  vs
E1 1200 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 0.88 - 1.35V
Operating temperature 5 - 73.3°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.44 GHz 1.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.44 GHz 1.41 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Intel Celeron E1400
Report a correction
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus