Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron E1200

Front view of Intel Celeron E1200
Front view of Intel Celeron D 330

Intel Celeron D 330

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron E1200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C vs 67 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 59.31W More than 10% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 3 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 63.95 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 17.59 $/year More than 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron D 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 330

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz vs 3.16 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz vs 2.69 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron E1200  vs D 330 

clock speed

Celeron E1200
1.6 GHz
Celeron D 330
2.66 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron E1200
0.5 MB
Celeron D 330
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron E1200
3.16 GHz
Celeron D 330
3.53 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron E1200
2.69 GHz
Celeron D 330
3.9 GHz

TDP

Celeron E1200
65W
Celeron D 330
73W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron E1200  vs
D 330 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.66 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features
Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 65W 73W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 63.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 59.31W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

 Celeron E1200  vs
D 330 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 125,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 20
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.16 GHz 3.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.69 GHz 3.9 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,815.5 515.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz 3.53 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron E1200
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 330
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss