Winner
Intel Celeron E1200
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron E1200 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Celeron E1200 vs AMD E1 1200 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Celeron E1200
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
4.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron E1200
 | Is unlocked Yes | | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 578 |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD E1 1200
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
6.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 1200
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Has virtualization support Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E1200 vs 1200 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 6.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.16 GHz | vs | 1.41 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 578 | vs | 368 | More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 52.81W | 3.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 73.3 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.33 pt/W | vs | 0.78 pt/W | Around 3x better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 3.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron E1200 vs E1 1200
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron E1200 | vs | E1 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.78 pt/W | 2.33 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 14.63W | |
details | Celeron E1200 | vs | E1 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.88 - 1.35V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.69 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.16 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 7310 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
 Intel Celeron E1200  Report a correction |  AMD E1 1200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
