Winner
Intel Celeron E1200
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron E1200 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Celeron E1200 vs AMD E1 1200 |
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 578 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
6.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.16 GHz | vs | 1.41 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 578 | vs | 368 | More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 52.81W | 3.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 73.3 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.33 pt/W | vs | 0.78 pt/W | Around 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 3.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Celeron E1200 | vs | E1 1200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.78 pt/W | 2.33 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 14.63W |
details | Celeron E1200 | vs | E1 1200 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.88 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.69 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.16 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 7310 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 |
Intel Celeron E1200 ![]() | AMD E1 1200 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||