Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron D 352

Front view of Intel Celeron D 352
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

AMD Sempron 140

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 352

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 352

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.7 GHz vs 3.69 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 69.2 °C vs 63 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz vs 3.93 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 839 vs 693 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better performance per watt 1.95 pt/W vs 0.52 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 69.88W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 20.72 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 75.34 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Apr, 2006 Release date over 3 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 352 vs Sempron 140

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron D 352
305
Sempron 140
738

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron D 352
693
Sempron 140
839

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron D 352  vs
Sempron 140 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
AM3

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption
TDP 86W 45W
Annual home energy cost 20.72 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 75.34 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.52 pt/W 1.95 pt/W
Typical power consumption 69.88W 36.56W

bus
Clock speed 533 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

 Celeron D 352  vs
Sempron 140 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.32V 0.82 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.2°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 4.7 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz 3.93 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 800.1 1,557.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.7 GHz 3.69 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 352
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss