Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 350J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350J

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz vs 1.91 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower typical power consumption 17.06W vs 59.31W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 350J  vs 350 

clock speed

Celeron D 350J
3.2 GHz
Celeron D 350
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 350J
1.91 GHz
Celeron D 350
3.2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 350J
1.3 GHz
Celeron D 350
3.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 350J  vs
350 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
479

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 73W 21W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 5.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 18.4 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 17.06W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Celeron D 350J  vs
350 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 144,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 24
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.91 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.91 GHz 3.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 400 MHz
Intel Celeron D 350J
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus