0 Comments
| Intel Celeron D 350 vs Atom N450 |
Released June, 2005
Intel Celeron D 350
- 1.3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron D 350
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 820 |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Atom N450
- 1.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N450
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron D 350CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 820 | vs | 242 | Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,901 | vs | 297 | Around 6.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.67 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher clock speed | 1.66 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 4.47W | vs | 17.06W | 3.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Jun, 2005 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | vs | 5.06 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 18.4 $/year | 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs Atom N450
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron D 350
1,901
Atom N450
297
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron D 350
820
Atom N450
242
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron D 350 | vs | Atom N450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 21W | 5.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 5.06 $/year | 1.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 18.4 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.04 pt/W | 4.63 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 17.06W | 4.47W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron D 350 | vs | Atom N450 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 123,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 24 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 1.25 - 1.4V | 0.8 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Integrated | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in |
Intel Celeron D 350 ![]() | Intel Atom N450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
Intel Atom N280 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $64 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $64 | |
Intel Atom N455 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
Intel Atom N570 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
Intel Atom N550 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
AMD C 50 vs Intel Atom N450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||