Intel Celeron D 350 vs Atom N450 |
Released June, 2005
Intel Celeron D 350
- 1.3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron D 350
 | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 820 |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Atom N450
- 1.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N450
| | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron D 350CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 820 | vs | 242 | Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,901 | vs | 297 | Around 6.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.67 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1.66 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 4.47W | vs | 17.06W | 3.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Jun, 2005 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | vs | 5.06 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 18.4 $/year | 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs Atom N450
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron D 350 | vs | Atom N450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.66 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 21W | 5.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 5.06 $/year | 1.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 18.4 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.04 pt/W | 4.63 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 17.06W | 4.47W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron D 350 | vs | Atom N450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 123,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 24 | 10 | |
| Voltage range | 1.25 - 1.4V | 0.8 - 1.18V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 1.67 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Integrated | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
 Intel Celeron D 350  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| Intel Atom N270 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | ||
| Intel Atom N280 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $64 | |
| Intel Atom N2600 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | $64 | |
| Intel Atom N455 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | ||
| Intel Atom N570 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | ||
| Intel Atom N550 vs N450 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | ||
| AMD C 50 vs Intel Atom N450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
