Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron D 350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 820 vs 284 Around 3x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz vs 2.12 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 2.62 pt/W Around 55% better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 1,901 vs 701 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Newer Jun, 2010 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 5 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Lower typical power consumption 10.56W vs 17.06W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year vs 5.06 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year vs 18.4 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs Atom D525

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 350  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 21W 13W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 4.04 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 10.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron D 350  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 144,000,000 176,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.8 - 1.18V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz 2.12 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus