Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
Much better PassMark score 1,901 vs 1,436 More than 30% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 820 vs 800 Around 5% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower typical power consumption 17.06W vs 52.81W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 1.14 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 71.5 °C vs 67 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 14 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.28 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs E2 3200

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E2 3200
1,436

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 350  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 21W 65W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 4.04 pt/W 1.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 52.81W

details

Celeron D 350  vs
E2 3200 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 144,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.91 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 71.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz 3.28 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A AMD Radeon HD 6370D

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus