CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Celeron D 350 vs E 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E 350
n.d.
Atom D525
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E 350
n.d.
Atom D525
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron D 350 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron D 350  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron D 350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 17.06W vs 30.2W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 820 vs 420 More than 95% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt
Better PassMark score 1,901 vs 782 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year vs 12 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year vs 28.21 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 67 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 5 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs E 350

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 350  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 21W 18W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 4.04 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 30.2W

details

Celeron D 350  vs
E 350 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 8
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus