CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 350 vs P320 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron D 350 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron D 350  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron D 350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 820 vs 675 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 3.13 pt/W Around 30% better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer May, 2010 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 4 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron D 350 vs Athlon II PCs P320

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 350  vs
Athlon II PCs P320 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
478
479
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 21W 25W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 4.04 pt/W 3.13 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 20.31W

details

Celeron D 350  vs
Athlon II PCs P320 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs P320
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus