Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 330

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz vs 1.48 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much lower typical power consumption 15.44W vs 59.31W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 16.64 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.58 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2007 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 3 years later

Features Key features of the Celeron D 330  vs 220 

clock speed

Celeron D 330
2.66 GHz
Celeron 220
1.2 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 330
0.25 MB
Celeron 220
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 330
3.53 GHz
Celeron 220
1.48 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 330
3.9 GHz
Celeron 220
1.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 330  vs
220 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
479

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 73W 19W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 4.58 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 16.64 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 15.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron D 330  vs
220 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 20 12
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1 - 1.34V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 1.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 1.48 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 330
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus