Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 326

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 326

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz vs 3.35 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 67 °C Almost the same
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.31 GHz vs 3.99 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron D 325

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 325

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 59.31W vs 68.25W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 326  vs 325 

clock speed

Celeron D 326
2.53 GHz
Celeron D 325
2.53 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 326
0.25 MB
Celeron D 325
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 326
3.73 GHz
Celeron D 325
3.35 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 326
4.31 GHz
Celeron D 325
3.99 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 326  vs
325 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 2.53 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 84W 73W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 63.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 59.31W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Celeron D 326  vs
325 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 125,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 19 19
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.73 GHz 3.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.31 GHz 3.99 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 462.1 572.7
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz 3.35 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Celeron D 326
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 325
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus