Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 325

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 325

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.53 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.35 GHz vs 2.36 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.99 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Sempron 2800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2800+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 50.38W vs 59.31W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 67 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year vs 63.95 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year vs 17.59 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 325  vs Sempron 2800+ 

clock speed

Celeron D 325
2.53 GHz
Sempron 2800+
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 325
0.25 MB
Sempron 2800+
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 325
3.35 GHz
Sempron 2800+
2.36 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 325
3.99 GHz
Sempron 2800+
1.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 325  vs
Sempron 2800+ 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
754
AM2
462

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 62W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 54.31 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 50.38W

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 200 MHz

details

Celeron D 325  vs
Sempron 2800+ 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.35 GHz 2.36 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.99 GHz 1.8 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 572.7 543.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.35 GHz 2.36 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 325
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2800+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus