Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 320

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz vs 1.89 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom 230

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 230

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 3.25W vs 19.91W 6.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 85.2 °C vs 67 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2008 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 4 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year vs 5.9 $/year 6.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year vs 21.46 $/year 6.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 320  vs Atom 230 

clock speed

Celeron D 320
1.3 GHz
Atom 230
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 320
0.5 MB
Atom 230
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 320
3.37 GHz
Atom 230
1.89 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 320
2.4 GHz
Atom 230
1.6 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 320  vs
Atom 230 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
479
437

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 24.5W 4W
Annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year 0.96 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year 3.5 $/year
Typical power consumption 19.91W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 400 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron D 320  vs
Atom 230 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 77,000,000 47,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 13 12
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.9 - 1.16V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 85.2°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.37 GHz 1.89 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz 1.89 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 320
Report a correction
Intel Atom 230
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus