Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 315J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 315J

Report a correction
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 67 °C vs 63 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.26 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 59.31W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 63.95 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 17.59 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 315J  vs Sempron 140 

clock speed

Celeron D 315J
2.26 GHz
Sempron 140
2.7 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 315J
3.1 GHz
Sempron 140
3.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 315J
2.27 GHz
Sempron 140
3.93 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 315J  vs
Sempron 140 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
AM3

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 45W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 36.56W

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Celeron D 315J  vs
Sempron 140 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.82 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 3.93 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 540.3 1,557.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 3.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 315J
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus