Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 315J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 315J

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.26 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 30.2W vs 59.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 67 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 12 $/year vs 17.59 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 315J  vs E 350 

clock speed

Celeron D 315J
2.26 GHz
E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 315J
0.25 MB
E 350
1 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 315J
3.1 GHz
E 350
3.5 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 315J
2.27 GHz
E 350
3.5 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 315J  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 18W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 28.21 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 30.2W

details

Celeron D 315J  vs
E 350 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 17 8
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Celeron D 315J
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus