Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 315J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 315J

Report a correction
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of AMD A10 4600M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 4600M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.25 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 59.31W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 67 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer May, 2012 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron D 315J  vs A10 4600M 

clock speed

Celeron D 315J
2.26 GHz
A10 4600M
2.3 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 315J
0.25 MB
A10 4600M
4 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 315J
3.1 GHz
A10 4600M
2.93 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 315J
2.27 GHz
A10 4600M
2.3 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 315J  vs
A10 4600M 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 73W 35W
Annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 59.31W 28.44W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Celeron D 315J  vs
A10 4600M 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.25 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 17 23
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.81 - 1.3V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 2.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 2.93 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 496 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 685 MHz
Intel Celeron D 315J
Report a correction
AMD A10 4600M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus