Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 310

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 19.91W vs 50.38W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year vs 14.94 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year vs 54.31 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 67 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Features Key features of the Celeron D 310  vs Sempron 3000+ 

clock speed

Celeron D 310
1.2 GHz
Sempron 3000+
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 310
0.5 MB
Sempron 3000+
0.13 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 310  vs
Sempron 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
478
754

features

Has a NX bit No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 24.5W 62W
Annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year 54.31 $/year
Typical power consumption 19.91W 50.38W

details

Celeron D 310  vs
Sempron 3000+ 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 70°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 200 MHz
Intel Celeron D 310
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus