Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 310

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 19.91W vs 36.56W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 67 °C vs 63 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 145

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 145

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 2.93 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.28 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron D 310  vs Sempron 145 

clock speed

Celeron D 310
1.2 GHz
Sempron 145
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron D 310
2.93 GHz
Sempron 145
4.05 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron D 310
2.13 GHz
Sempron 145
4.28 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 310  vs
Sempron 145 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
478
AM3

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 24.5W 45W
Annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 19.91W 36.56W

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Celeron D 310  vs
Sempron 145 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.82 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.93 GHz 4.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.13 GHz 4.28 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 521.3 1,763.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.93 GHz 4.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron D 310
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 145
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus