Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron D 310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 310

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 130 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.2 GHz vs 0.5 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.13 MB More than 3.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core More than 3.8x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2004 vs Jun, 1999 Release date over 4 years later
Front view of AMD K6-2+ 500

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-2+ 500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-2+ 500 vs the Intel Celeron D 310.

Features Key features of the Celeron D 310  vs K6-2+ 500 

clock speed

Celeron D 310
1.2 GHz
K6-2+ 500
0.5 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron D 310
0.5 MB
K6-2+ 500
0.13 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron D 310  vs
K6-2+ 500 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 0.5 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
478
Slot A
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Celeron D 310  vs
K6-2+ 500 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 19.91W N/A

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 100 MHz
Intel Celeron D 310
Report a correction
AMD K6-2+ 500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus