Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B830

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 X2 56 vs the Intel Celeron B830.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B830 vs Turion 64 X2 56

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B830  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

power consumption

TDP 35W 33W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 7.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 26.81W

details

Celeron B830  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 95°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron B830
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 56
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus