CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of B830 vs 450

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Celeron B830 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron B830  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron B830

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B830

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Slightly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.65 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 867 vs 433 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 2,219 vs 1,051 More than 2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 1,558 vs 783 Around 2x better PassMark score
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B830 vs E 450

GeekBench (32-bit)

Celeron B830
2,219
E 450
1,051

GeekBench

Celeron B830
2,219
E 450
2,017

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B830  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
Super 7
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 6.84 pt/W 7.74 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W

details

Celeron B830  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 40 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6320
Intel Celeron B830
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus