CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of B830 vs 450

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
Intel Celeron B830 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron B830  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron B830

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B830

Report a correction
Much better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 600 MHz 75% better turbo clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 867 vs 434 Around 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
More l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B830 vs E 450

GeekBench (32-bit)

Celeron B830
2,211
E 450
1,056

GeekBench

Celeron B830
2,211
E 450
2,017

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B830  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
Super 7
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AMD64
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AMD-V
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066

details

Celeron B830  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6320
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 6.81 pt/W 6.72 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W
Intel Celeron B830
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus