Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B830

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ vs the Intel Celeron B830.

Features Key features of the Celeron B830  vs Athlon XP-M 1600+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B830  vs
Athlon XP-M 1600+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron B830  vs
Athlon XP-M 1600+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Celeron B830
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus