Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B830

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 65

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 65

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon X2 65 vs the Intel Celeron B830.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B830 vs Athlon X2 65

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B830  vs
Athlon X2 65 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 2.72 pt/W 1.51 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Celeron B830  vs
Athlon X2 65 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.94 GHz 2.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.94 GHz 2.21 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron B830
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 65
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus