Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B820

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B820

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+ vs the Intel Celeron B820.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B820 vs Athlon XP-M 1700+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B820  vs
Athlon XP-M 1700+ 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.47 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
462
563

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron B820  vs
Athlon XP-M 1700+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.71 GHz 2.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 1.47 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 828.3 86.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.71 GHz 2.11 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Celeron B820
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP-M 1700+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus