Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B810E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B810E

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the B810E vs the 1000M.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per dollar 0.98 pt/$ vs 0.63 pt/$ More than 55% better performance per dollar
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,456 vs 1,196 More than 20% better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better performance per watt 2.11 pt/W vs 1.42 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B810E vs 1000M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810E
78.4 MB/s
Celeron 1000M
93,900 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B810E  vs
1000M 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.42 pt/W 2.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron B810E  vs
1000M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 16 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,998.4 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron B810E
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus