Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B810E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B810E

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,097 vs 1,147 Around 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 29,700 MB/s vs 78.4 MB/s More than 378.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.59 pt/W vs 1.42 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Better performance per dollar 0.76 pt/$ vs 0.63 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Jun, 2011 Release date 8 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B810E vs Atom D2550

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810E
78.4 MB/s
Atom D2550
29,700 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B810E  vs
Atom D2550 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 10W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.42 pt/W 3.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Celeron B810E  vs
Atom D2550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,998.4 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Celeron B810E
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus