Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B810

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B810

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 71,400 MB/s vs 53,200 MB/s Around 35% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,121 vs 1,056 More than 2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better turbo clock speed 950 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 60% better turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 508 MHz Around 30% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Slightly better performance per watt 2.98 pt/W vs 2.35 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 7 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B810 vs E 450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810
2,060
E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810
1,202
E 450
642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810
71,400 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B810
2,121
E 450
1,056

GeekBench

Celeron B810
2,121
E 450
2,017

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron B810
1,373
E 450
770

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B810  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988A
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Celeron B810  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 16 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6320
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.35 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W
Intel Celeron B810
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus