Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B730

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B730

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the B730 vs the 1005M.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1005M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1005M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1005M vs the B730.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B730 vs 1005M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron B730
89.2 MB/s
Celeron 1005M
99,700 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B730  vs
1005M 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron B730  vs
1005M 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 5 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 1.9 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 1.42 pt/W 2.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Celeron B730
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1005M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus