Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron B720

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B720

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom N570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N570

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N570 vs the Celeron B720.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron B720 vs Atom N570

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron B720  vs
Atom N570 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.66 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 8.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.05 $/year
Performance per watt 0.95 pt/W 3.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 6.91W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Celeron B720  vs
Atom N570 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 1.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz 1.82 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Celeron B720
Report a correction
Intel Atom N570
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus