Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 927UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 927UE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 159.66W 11.6x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 61 °C More than 70% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 13.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 10.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 2 months later
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 5.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads

Features Key features of the Celeron 927UE  vs FX 8350 

clock speed

Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz
FX 8350
4.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz
FX 8350
8.79 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 927UE  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Single core Octa core
Socket type
BGA 1023
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 125W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 159.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 159.66W

details

Celeron 927UE  vs
FX 8350 
Threads 1 8
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 4.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Intel Celeron 927UE
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus