Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 900

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Duron 900

Reasons to consider the
AMD Duron 900

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Features Key features of the Celeron 900  vs Duron 900 

clock speed

Celeron 900
2.2 GHz
Duron 900
0.9 GHz

L2 cache

Duron 900
0.06 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 900
3.11 GHz
Duron 900
1.12 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 900
2.2 GHz
Duron 900
0.9 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 900  vs
Duron 900 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 200 MHz

details

Celeron 900  vs
Duron 900 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.06 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.06 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.11 GHz 1.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz 1.12 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
Intel Celeron 900
Report a correction
AMD Duron 900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus