0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 887 vs 1017U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 887 vs the 1017U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1017U vs the 887. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 887 vs 1017U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 887
1,990.5
Celeron 1017U
2,290
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 887
1,154.5
Celeron 1017U
1,321
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 887
74.3 MB/s
Celeron 1017U
84,150 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 887
1,965
Celeron 1017U
2,175
GeekBench
Celeron 887
1,965
Celeron 1017U
2,175
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron 887
29
Celeron 1017U
26.8
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 887
1,297
Celeron 1017U
1,557
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 887
720
Celeron 1017U
853
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 887 | vs | 1017U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.25 pt/W | 4.56 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Celeron 887 | vs | 1017U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Celeron 887 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1017U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3110M vs Celeron 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron 1007U vs 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
Intel N3060 vs Celeron 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs Celeron 1017U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $86 | |
Intel Core i3 2365M vs Celeron 887 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||