Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 887

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 887

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 29 vs 18.4 Around 60% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 65% better turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 53,200 MB/s vs 74.3 MB/s More than 716x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 508 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 887 vs E 450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 887
1,990.5
E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 887
1,154.5
E 450
642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 887
74.3 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 887
1,965
E 450
1,056

GeekBench

Celeron 887
1,965
E 450
2,017

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

E 450
18.4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron 887
1,297
E 450
770

PassMark (Single Core)

E 450
431

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 887  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Celeron 887  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6320
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 3.25 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 14.63W
Intel Celeron 887
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus