0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 867 vs 2955U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 867 vs the 2955U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 2955U vs the 867. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 867 vs 2955U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 867
1,712.5
Celeron 2955U
2,239
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 867
1,027.5
Celeron 2955U
1,296
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 867
62.35 MB/s
Celeron 2955U
93,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 867
1,669
Celeron 2955U
2,100
GeekBench
Celeron 867
1,669
Celeron 2955U
2,490
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 867
1,199
Celeron 2955U
1,450
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 867
658
Celeron 2955U
792
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 867 | vs | 2955U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
BGA 1168 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.92 pt/W | 6.2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Celeron 867 | vs | 2955U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 14 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 1.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | HD (Haswell) | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 200 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Celeron 867 ![]() | Intel Celeron 2955U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $107 | |
3217U vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N2830 vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
N2840 vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
5 Dual vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $107 | |
1007U vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
J1900 vs 2955U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N3060 vs 2955U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||