Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 560 vs the 847.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs 560

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Celeron 847
2,817
Celeron 560
1,545

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
560 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron 847  vs
560 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 16
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 17W 31W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 7.47 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 2.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 25.19W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus