Winner
Intel Celeron 847
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847 based on its .
See full details Intel Celeron 847 vs 1007U |
VS
Bargain hunters, step right up! Today we're comparing two laptop CPUs to see which one is worth your bottom dollar. This is a matchup between the Intel Celeron 847 versus the Intel Celeron 1007U.
The 847 is a Dual Core processor released last June 2011, and it's part of the 32nm Sandy Bridge architecture. It's clocked at 1.1 GHz, with 2 MB cache and a power consumption of 17W TDP. These specifications are pretty basic, and show that the 847's performance is merely confined to casual tasks such as drafting office documents and checking e-mail.
On the other hand, the 1007U is also a Dual Core but with a much newer release date of January 2013. It's part of the newer 22nm Ivy Bridge architecture, which effectively improves the clock speed at a much faster 1.5 GHz. It's similarly equipped with a 2MB cache and consumes 17W TDP as well. With only a mere increase in clock speed, how does it fare when it comes to real world performance?
The 1007U absolutely trumped the 847 in all benchmarks. It posted a 43% advantage in the PassMark test, and a solid 51% in the single core benchmark. What makes this all the more impressive is the fact that the 1007U is cheaper than the 847 by $30 on average. Without a fighting chance, the Intel Celeron 847 can now be considered as an obsolete model.
In conclusion, we recommend the Intel Celeron 1007U as the smart choice for the laptop user on a budget.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 1007U among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 1.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 847 vs the 1007U. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1007U vs the 847. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs 1007U
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 4.38 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Celeron 847 | vs | 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 11 | 15 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Celeron 847  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1007U Report a correction |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 2 laptops with the Intel Celeron 847, starting from $259
- 3 laptops with the Intel Celeron 1007U, starting from $260
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $42 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom N2600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $82 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs AMD A6 1450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $134 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs Pentium 2117U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs N2830 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
