0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom N2800 |
Released June, 2011
Intel Celeron 847
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 847
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N2800 vs the Celeron 847. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Atom N2800
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
1,460
Atom N2800
1,082
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
878
Atom N2800
456
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Atom N2800
29,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
1,405
Atom N2800
1,037
GeekBench
Celeron 847
2,817
Atom N2800
1,413
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron 847
23.4
Atom N2800
21.1
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 847
938
Atom N2800
619
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 847
539
Atom N2800
285
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | Atom N2800 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 6.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 1.57 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 5.28 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 5.28W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s |
details | Celeron 847 | vs | Atom N2800 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 640 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 4,997.12 MB |
Intel Celeron 847 ![]() | Intel Atom N2800 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $42 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom N2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD E 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $75 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $82 | |
Intel Atom N2800 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||